For universities, programs, and platforms
The verified learning system your program can stand behind.
Every claim we serve has a source, a verification decision, and a record of who decided what and when. Content that has not cleared verification does not reach students.
Pathophysiology is live today. Everything on this page describes what the system does and what we can show you — not projected results.
Claim record
VerifiedIn compensated heart failure, elevated preload maintains stroke volume via Frank–Starling recruitment.
- Source
- Primary text, edition + page cited
- Verification
- Two independent reviewers, agreement recorded
- Gate
- Blocked from delivery until both cleared
- Trail
- Reviewer, timestamp, decision, revision hash
Illustrative record structure
Why verification matters here
Advanced coursework is where an unverified claim becomes an institutional problem.
In the hardest courses, students memorize what they are given. Anything wrong is retained with the same effort as anything right — and remediation lands on your faculty.
You are accountable for the content, not the vendor
When a study resource contradicts your curriculum, the question lands with your faculty. Verification exists so an answer is available in seconds, with the source attached.
Provenance is reviewable, not asserted
Each claim carries its source and its verification decision. Faculty can inspect the chain instead of taking a confidence score on faith.
Governance survives staff turnover
Decisions live in the record, not in one reviewer's memory. A new course lead can see what was approved, by whom, and on what basis.
Unverified content is gated, not flagged
A warning label still ships the claim. Our gate withholds delivery until verification clears, so students never study an unresolved statement.
The governed engine
Source → verify → gate → serve.
One pipeline, in one direction, with a record at every step. Nothing reaches a student by bypassing it.
01
Source
Every claim starts from a citable primary or standard course reference, recorded with edition and location. No uncited synthesis enters the pipeline.
02
Verify
Independent review checks the claim against its source. Agreement, disagreement, and resolution are all recorded — not just the final state.
03
Gate
Delivery is blocked until verification clears. Content that fails or stalls stays out of the student experience rather than shipping with a caveat.
04
Serve
Only cleared content is served, with its record attached, so any claim a student sees can be traced back to its source and decision.
Audit trail
Append-only history for each claim: source citation, reviewer identity, decision, timestamp, and the revision it applied to. Corrections add entries; they do not overwrite them, so a claim's past state is recoverable during a review.
Certificate chain
Each served item carries a reference back to the verification decisions it depends on — claim, source, and reviewers. Change a source and everything downstream returns to the gate rather than staying live on an old approval.
Early results — stated honestly
We would rather show you the method than quote a number we cannot defend.
Mastrii is early. We are not publishing score gains, pass-rate deltas, or institutional logos, because we do not yet have results that would survive the scrutiny your program applies to any other intervention.
What exists today
A live Pathophysiology course built through the verification pipeline, with per-claim records you can inspect during a demo.
What we are measuring
Verification throughput and reviewer disagreement rates, plus retention behavior within the product. Method and definitions shared on request.
What we will claim
Outcome effects only from a design your faculty would accept — comparison group, pre-registered measure, and full method published alongside.
If a vendor shows you a large effect size at this stage, ask for the design. We would ask the same of us.
Alignment to your program
Mapped to your objectives, your sequence, and your assessments.
Verification answers whether a claim is true. Alignment answers whether it belongs in your course, this week.
Objective mapping
Your course objectives are imported and each claim is attached to the objectives it serves. Coverage gaps and out-of-scope material both become visible.
Sequence awareness
Content follows your syllabus order, so students are not pushed into material the course has not reached.
Assessment fit
Practice is generated against your objectives and the depth your exams actually require, rather than a generic question bank.
Faculty control
Course leads can scope, exclude, or annotate content. Their changes are recorded in the same trail as verification decisions.
Security & privacy
What we can say today, and what we will not say yet.
This section is deliberately conservative. We will not name a framework, certification, or regulatory status until it is confirmed with counsel and evidence we can hand to your review team.
Our practice
- Data in transit and at rest is encrypted, and access is limited to staff who need it for support.
- An evaluation can run without student records; we prefer to start there.
- We will complete your security questionnaire and name our subprocessors in writing.
- Deletion and export requests are handled by a named contact, not a ticket queue.
Placeholder — to be confirmed with counsel
- FERPA posture and the role we would take under it: under review with counsel, language pending.
- Data processing agreement template: in drafting.
- Independent security attestation: not held today; we will say so plainly rather than imply otherwise.
- Accessibility conformance statement: in progress, no claim made yet.
If your review process requires any of the above before a pilot, tell us on the call and we will tell you honestly where we stand.
Catalog & roadmap
One course live. The rest is a roadmap, described as one.
Our long-term scope is the 200 hardest advanced courses. Those courses do not exist in Mastrii today, and we will not present them as if they do.
Pathophysiology
Built end to end through the verification pipeline. Available to inspect claim by claim during a demo, including items still held at the gate.
In production
Next courses
Sequenced with partner programs so the courses we build next are the ones an institution has committed to using. Named on request, with honest dates.
Roadmap
The 200 hardest courses
The intended long-term catalog. A target, not an inventory — verification throughput sets the pace, and we would rather move slowly than ship unverified courses.
Pricing
Priced per engagement, quoted after scope.
Cost depends on courses in scope, cohort size, and review requirements. We quote in writing after a scoping call — no per-seat list price on this page.
Course pilot
One course, one cohort
- A single live course, scoped to your objectives
- Faculty review access to verification records
- Fixed evaluation window with a written debrief
Program
A full program or department
- Multiple courses aligned to your sequence
- Course-lead controls and audit trail access
- Named contact for security and data questions
Platform
Institutions and education platforms
- Multi-program rollout with shared governance
- Integration discussion with your systems team
- Joint roadmap input on course sequencing
Bring us the course you are least comfortable outsourcing.
We will walk your faculty through the verification record for it, including what has not cleared the gate.